High-tech means high energy demand

Guest Columnist

Getting up at 4:30 in the morning in Olympia to make an 8 a.m.


meeting 60 miles away in downtown Seattle is “for the birds!” For us


country folk, that means you wake up the rooster on the way out the driveway.


But that’s not unusual these days. Recently I left our house at 5:15


a.m. and headed north on I-5 for Seattle. Traffic was heavy for the first 30


miles, but I traveled along near the 60-mile-an-hour speed limit. No sweat, I’m


in Tacoma at 5:45 a.m. . . . but then I hit a wall of


stop-and-go traffic and didn’t roll into the parking garage


in downtown Seattle until 7:25 a.m. — an hour and


40 minutes later. I couldn’t even blame it on an


accident blocking traffic — it’s just more vehicles


on the road.


I thought to myself, “Are we crazy to oppose I-745?” Initiative 745


would pump 90 cents of every transportation dollar into new or existing roads.


The idea is that if people are going to commute to work in their cars, why


not spend the money on roads?


But I’m not sure that building new roads or adding to existing


freeway capacity will solve our congestion problem. For example, there are


choke points — like I-5 through downtown Seattle — that may be next to


impossible to widen.


Yes, roads will be a key part of our transportation system, and


the highway and freeway system needs upgrading and additional capacity.


But we need other transportation investments as well. For


example, more and more people tell me, “If I could just catch a train from


Olympia to Seattle and avoid the traffic jams, I’d do it in a flash.”


Mass transit can be a viable option as long as it is convenient,


user-friendly and cost effective. Will it be all those things? Maybe, maybe


not. And perhaps we won’t know for years to come — but it can work.


In Washington, D.C., for example, the Metro subway system cost


taxpayers billions of dollars when it was built back in the ’60s and ’70s. Today,


it moves thousands of commuters and tourists each day quickly around


the nation’s capitol. It is convenient, efficient and safe.


Has the Metro system eliminated traffic jams in D.C.? No. The


traffic jams are as bad today as they were before it was built. Does that mean


the Metro is a failure? No. Thanks to the Metro, traffic congestion has not


worsened in Washington, D.C., despite 30 years of population growth.


Sometimes when I’m crawling along I-5 at a snail’s pace, I yearn


for a simple solution to all our traffic troubles. But the truth is, there


is no simple solution. Traffic congestion


is a complex problem that requires a careful, balanced solution. Sitting


in traffic is “for the birds,” but I


don’t think spending 90 cents out of each dollar on roads is the answer.


That’s why I’m against I-745.




Don Brunell is president of the Association of Washington


Business, Washington state’s chamber of commerce. Visit AWB on the


Web at www.awb.org.